At the June 2022 Green Party Executive meeting, two LGBTIQA+ Greens serving on the Executive – Rosie Rawle and Matt Browne – likened a suggestion for mediation between Green Party members who disagreed with their Stonewall’s views of sex and gender to asking black people to sit down with the Ku Klux Klan or white suprematists.
Rashid Nix, Chair of the Greens of Colours and present at that meeting pointed out that black people have a long and proud history of sitting down with white suprematists and indeed sit down with racists everyday.
Did the Chair of the Executive Jon Nott take action against those two individuals – as expressly requested by members of the Green Party General Council (GPRC) at the time – and extract an apology from them both to black members for making such extraordinary racist analogy? He did not.
That same year, Matt Browne played a key part in the discriminatory demotion of Dr Shahrar Ali. Meanwhile, Rosie Rawle, who is still a member of the Executive, was directly instrumental in a failed attempt by the Standing Orders Committee (also controlled by trans activists) to dissafiliate the Green Party Women Special Interest Group.
As demonstrated ever since 2022 with a financially disastrous court case and much reputational damage over ‘Greens in Exile’ at the 2024 Conference, the Chair of the Executive appears to share the same gender ideology as LGBTIQA trans activists, as was Mary Clegg, the former party’s CEO who came forward as a witness at the court case.
Given that GPRC has been slowly and systematically ‘captured’ over the past three years from the bottom up through a national network of trans activists and has doubled-down on the purge of non-believers instead of holding the Executive to account, the opposite has in fact been the case.
Why ? Because the majority of GPRC and Executive members are united in pursuing a trans activists war against the most active and experienced members of the party who disagree with Stonewall’s definition of sex and demand to have the right to express their views freely without fear of being bullied and be suspended from membership.
Sadly, any suggestion by co-leader and MP Adrian Ramsay that members of GPRC and the Executive could jointly review the disciplinary procedure – as if the process itelf was the cause of our deep divisions and dysfunctionality – shows a remarkable level of wishful thinking or plain naivety.
This is because control over the disciplinary process is precisely what all green trans activists have been eager to achieve since trans woman Aimee Challenor’s motion “Recognising Trans Rights” was passed by Conference in 2016 and thus became party policy.
Letting go of the discriminatory clauses inserted by GPRC within the Code of Conduct now or simply seeking to “review” the process would threaten the very purpose of trans activists who are the keenest and best organised identinarians across the party.
Last but not least, they also know they can count on the backing from co-leader and MP Carla Denyer, Deputy Leader Zac Polanski, Sian Berrry MP, Ellie Chowns MP, Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle and others holding key positions of responsiblity within the party,
As revealed with many examples published in this blog, what we are dealing with is a cult. For the two to three hundred of the most vulnerable and mostly young cult followers therefore, any change to the disciplinary process which would restore freedom of expression ( thus deprive them of the power to shut down debate and press on with their purge), would lead to a deeply damaging loss of their own sense of self and identity.
Such suggestion as conducting a mere “review” of the disciplinary process from co-leader Adrian Ramsay does miss the point entirely. It shows a lack of understanding of identity politics and a total ignorance of the Long March of its storm troupers towards the capture of all our institutions.
It is now widely documented that the ideological ‘capture’ started from universities social sciences and the arts and soon spread to the civil service, all ‘progressive’ political parties, the main media and social media, the arts, education. As evidenced in Dr Cass Review Report on untested practices within Gender Clinics, it finally made its most significant impact yet on the NHS.
What is constitutionally and operationally dynfunctional about the Green Party which has enabled the taking control of all our instruments of governance by a cult is what the Green Light team has sought to explore and reveal, as per in our Mission Statement in February 2023. We trust that the 4532 people who have visited our blog so far this year have found our work a worthwhile endeavour.
The team is now working with others on how Conference where all party policies are determined by less than 1% of the membership was captured many years ago and how this has played out at the Autumn 2024 event in Manchester.
Your comments are welcome : TheGreenLightBLog@protonmail.com
The Green Light 